PubPeer Spotlight – 2024-11-27 04:00:17
Bài báo công bố từ tháng 10-2023 trên tạp chí Memories – Materials, Devices, Circuits and Systems của nhà xuất bản Elsevier chứa rất nhiều câu kỳ quặc do ChatGPT tạo ra. Tác giả đã chép nguyên xi từ ChatGPT vào bài. Thế nhưng cả reviewer, editor và nhân viên nhà xuất bản có lẽ không đọc bài nên đều không phát hiện ra.
> Sorry, but in order to provide an academic rewrite, I need more details or context.
> There was no text provided by the user to alter.
> The user’s text does not contain any information to rewrite in an academic manner.
> It is not necessary to rewrite the user’s text to make it more scholarly.
> There is nothing in the user’s text that needs to be changed.
> The user’s text is too short to be rewritten academically.
> The user’s text does not contain any information or context to be rewritten in an academic manner.
Nguồn: https://pubpeer.com/publications/6C35044BDB081EF8A1546D6190BC7D
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773064623000658
Shared link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773064623000658
Statistics:
Likes: 242, Shares: 16, Comments: 7
Like Reactions: 79, Haha Reactions: 125, Wow Reactions: 30, Love Reactions: 2, Sad Reactions: 6, Angry Reactions: 0